F.2.3.1
Manning's Equation for Preliminary Sizing
Manning's equation is used for preliminary sizing of open channel reaches of uniform cross‑section and slope (i.e., prismatic channels) and uniform roughness. This method assumes the flow depth (or normal depth) and flow velocity remain constant throughout the channel reach for a given flow.
The charts in Figure II-4.11 and Figure II-4.12 may be used to obtain graphic solutions of Manning's equation for common ditch sections. For conditions outside the range of these charts or for more precise results, Manning's equation can be solved directly from its classic forms shown in Equation F.2 and Equation F.3.
Table F.5 provides a reference for selecting the appropriate "n" values for open channels. A number of engineering reference books, such as Open-Channel Hydraulics by V.T. Chow, may also be used as guides to select "n" values. Figure II-4.13 contains the geometric elements of common channel sections useful in determining area A, wetted perimeter WP, and hydraulic radius (R= A/WP).
If flow restrictions occur that raise the water level above normal depth within a given channel reach, a backwater condition (or subcritical flow) is said to exist. This condition can result from flow restrictions created by a downstream culvert, bridge, dam, pond, lake, etc., and even a downstream channel reach having a higher flow depth. If backwater conditions are found to exist for the design flow, a backwater profile shall be computed to verify that the channel's capacity is still adequate as designed. The Direct Step or Standard Step backwater methods presented in this section may be used for this purpose.
Table F.5. Values of Roughness Coefficient “n” for Open Channels.
Type of Channel and Description
|
Manning's “n”* (normal)
|
A. Constructed Channels
|
a. Earth, straight and uniform
|
|
1. Clean, recently completed
|
0.018
|
2. Gravel, uniform section, clean
|
0.025
|
3. With short grass, few weeds
|
0.027
|
b. Earth, winding and sluggish
|
|
1. No vegetation
|
0.025
|
2. Grass, some weeds
|
0.030
|
3. Dense weeds or aquatic plants in deep channels
|
0.035
|
4. Earth bottom and rubble sides
|
0.030
|
5. Stony bottom and weedy banks
|
0.035
|
6. Cobble bottom and clean sides
|
0.040
|
c. Rock lined
|
|
1. Smooth and uniform
|
0.035
|
2. Jagged and irregular
|
0.040
|
d. Channels not maintained, weeds and brush uncut
|
|
1. Dense weeds, high as flow depth
|
0.080
|
2. Clean bottom, brush on sides
|
0.050
|
3. Same as #2, highest stage of flow
|
0.070
|
4. Dense brush, high stage
|
0.100
|
B. Natural Streams
|
B-1 Minor streams (top width at flood stage<100 feet)
|
a. Streams on plain
|
|
1. Clean, straight, full stage no rifts or deep pools
|
0.030
|
2. Same as #1, but more stones and weeds
|
0.035
|
3. Clean, winding, some pools and shoals
|
0.040
|
4. Same as #3, but some weeds
|
0.040
|
5. Same as #4, but more stones
|
0.050
|
6. Sluggish reaches, weedy deep pools
|
0.070
|
7. Very weedy reaches, deep pools, or floodways with heavy stand of timber and underbrush
|
0.100
|
b. Mountain streams, no vegetation in channel, banks usually steep, trees and brush along banks submerged at high stages
|
|
1. Bottom: gravel, cobbles, and few boulders
|
0.040
|
2. Bottom: cobbles with large boulders
|
0.050
|
B-2 Floodplains
|
a. Pasture, no brush
|
|
1. Short grass
|
0.030
|
2. High grass
|
0.035
|
b. Cultivated areas
|
|
1. No crop
|
0.030
|
2. Mature row crops
|
0.035
|
3. Mature field crops
|
0.040
|
c. Brush
|
|
1. Scattered brush, heavy weeds
|
0.050
|
2. Light brush and trees
|
0.060
|
3. Medium to dense brush
|
0.070
|
4. Heavy, dense brush
|
0.100
|
d. Trees
|
|
1. Dense willows, straight
|
0.150
|
2. Cleared land with tree stumps, no sprouts
|
0.040
|
3. Same as #2, but with heavy growth of sprouts
|
0.060
|
4. Heavy stand of timber, a few down trees, little undergrowth, flood stage below branches
|
0.100
|
5. Same as #4, but with flood stage reaching branches
|
0.120
|
* Note: These “n” values are “normal” values for use in analysis of channels. For conservative design of channel capacity, the maximum values listed in other references should be considered. For channel bank stability, the minimum values should be considered.
|